PropFirmRefer
/
Sign inSign up
FirmsChallengesOffersHidden rulesCompareSpreadsPayoutsCountriesNews
Partner
Advertise on PropFirmRefer
PropFirmRefer

Know the hidden rules before you pay for the challenge. Prop firm data, checked and dated.

Explore

  • Firms
  • Challenges
  • Compare
  • Offers
  • Copy trading

Research

  • Hidden rules
  • Guides
  • Countries
  • What changed
  • Safety checks
  • Spreads

Tools

  • Pip calculator
  • Compounding
  • News calendar
  • News

Company

  • How we rank
  • About
  • Report a firm
  • Contact
PropFirmReferResearch platform for traders

PropFirmRefer earns a commission when you buy a challenge through our links, at no extra cost to you, and sells featured placement, which is labelled Featured wherever it appears. Neither changes a firm's Refer Score. How we rank. We are not a regulator, a broker or a financial adviser, and nothing here is investment advice. Trading carries risk of loss: read the risk disclaimer.

© 2026 PropFirmRefer · Terms · Privacy · Risk disclaimer

How we rank

The Refer Score is a number from 0 to 100. It is calculated, not assigned by hand, and it answers one question: how does this firm compare overall? It is built from ten categories: rule transparency, payout terms and reliability, trader reputation, challenge value, drawdown terms, trading flexibility, operating history, country access, platform choice and account scale.

A category only switches on once enough firms have comparable, verified data for it, at least a quarter of the firms we track. Until then it counts for no firm, and the categories that are on share the whole score between them. That is why every score today says it is based on currently verified data. As we research rules and payouts, more categories switch on and the score gets sharper.

  • Rule transparency. Of the questions we ask every firm (news trading, EAs, weekend and overnight holding, copy trading, consistency rules, minimum days, drawdown, payout split and frequency, country policy), how many the firm answers on its own pages. Only asked of firms whose rulebook we have read, so a firm is never marked down for research we have not done.
  • Payout terms and reliability. The profit split a trader keeps and how often the firm pays, from its own published terms. Whether the money actually arrived is counted separately on payouts, off the blockchain, and feeds no score.
  • Trader reputation. The rating traders give it, weighted so a handful of reviews cannot outrank hundreds.
  • Challenge value. What the firm charges per $100,000 of funding, taken as the median of its priced account sizes. The median rather than the cheapest: several firms sell one promotional seat far below the rest of their range.
  • Trading flexibility. What the firm allows: news trading, EAs, holding over the weekend and overnight, copy trading, and whether a consistency rule governs the profit. It needs at least three of those answers before it counts. What suits you is Rule Check, and that never feeds a score: a firm is not worse for not suiting one strategy.
  • Operating history. Years since the firm was founded. Firms that fail in this industry mostly fail early.
  • Drawdown terms. The rule that ends most accounts, scored on three things: what the limit follows, how much room it leaves in total, and how much it leaves in a day. A static limit scores highest and an intraday trailing one lowest, because that one follows profit you have not banked yet and never comes back down. Taken from the routes a firm sells rather than a headline number.
  • Country access. How many countries the firm turns away, counted from its own restricted list. A firm that blocks 140 countries is no use to the traders in them, and the median here blocks 14.
  • Platform choice. How many platforms a trader can pick from. It stops counting at four: past that the choice is not what decides anything.
  • Account scale. The largest account the firm will fund, measured in orders of magnitude rather than dollars, because $6m is not sixty times better than $100,000 to someone deciding where to start.
Current score coverage10 / 10 categories active
  • Rule transparencyActive
  • Payout terms and reliabilityActive
  • Trader reputationActive
  • Challenge valueActive
  • Drawdown termsActive
  • Trading flexibilityActive
  • Operating historyActive
  • Country accessActive
  • Platform choiceActive
  • Account scaleActive
CategoryWeightActive todayEffective weight today
Rule transparency20%Yes20%
Payout terms and reliability18%Yes18%
Trader reputation16%Yes16%
Challenge value12%Yes12%
Drawdown terms10%Yes10%
Trading flexibility8%Yes8%
Operating history6%Yes6%
Country access4%Yes4%
Platform choice3%Yes3%
Account scale3%Yes3%
Total100%100%

Currently active: Rule transparency, payout terms and reliability, trader reputation, challenge value, drawdown terms, trading flexibility, operating history, country access, platform choice and account scale. Effective weight today: 20% / 18% / 16% / 12% / 10% / 8% / 6% / 4% / 3% / 3%.

Rule Check does not change the Refer Score. Rule Check asks whether a firm suits the way you trade. A firm is not a worse firm because it does not suit your strategy, so nothing you tell Rule Check moves any score, and a firm can score highly and still be wrong for you.

How the maths works

Each active category is scaled from 0 to 1 across all the firms we track, so the best firm in a category scores 1 and the worst scores 0. That value is multiplied by the category's weight, the results are added, and the total is divided by the combined weight of the active categories.

Trader reputation uses a Bayesian average with a prior of 30 reviews. That stops a firm with four five-star reviews outranking one with nine hundred reviews averaging 4.7.

A firm with no data in an active category earns no points in it. Every firm is measured against the same total, so no firm can score higher by having less known about it. Every firm card shows this working under Why, and every firm page shows it under How we scored this.

The category worth explaining

Operating history carries real weight because survival is the strongest evidence available in this industry. Prop firms that fail almost always fail early, and they take funded accounts down with them. A firm that has paid traders through several years and a bad market has shown something no landing page can claim.

What money does and does not do

We earn a commission when you buy through our links. That commission has no input into the Refer Score. It is not one of the categories above, and there is no way for a firm to pay for a better one. Every score says whether we have an affiliate deal with that firm.

We do sell featured placement. Anywhere it appears it is labelled Featured. If it is not labelled, nobody paid for it.

The list also leads with the firms we have researched first-party, because a score built from public numbers cannot yet tell those apart from the ones we have only imported. That is an editorial judgement about research depth, not a paid position, and it never changes a firm's Refer Score.

What Live means

A firm can change a rule on a Tuesday and say nothing. So every night a job re-reads the pages we watch, compares each one against the copy we stored, and files a diff when the wording moves. Anything it finds is queued for a person. Nothing a machine reads is published without one of us approving it, which is why the badge says the pages are watched rather than that the page is right.

The badge appears on a firm only where we hold a page for it and the watchers have run in the last two days. If the pipeline stops, the badge goes, rather than quietly ageing into a claim that is no longer true. Some firms block this server at their firewall; their pages are read by hand and carry no badge.

We do not print a last-checked date. A date says more about the calendar than about the firm: the same unchanged page reads as current on the Tuesday and neglected by the Friday. What matters is whether anyone is still looking, and that is what the badge answers.

What we are not

We are not a regulator and we have no authority over any firm. Listing a firm is not an endorsement, and a high score is not a guarantee you will be paid. Trading carries risk of loss.